<?xml version="1.0"?>

<!-- <html> -->

<rss version="2.0">
<channel>

<title>Powerwatch Columnist - Denis Henshaw</title>
<description>News feed for Denis Henshaw's Powerwatch Column</description>
<link>http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/henshaw/index.asp</link>


<item>
<title>Adverse effects associated with exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields
- assembly of scientific evidence and discussion of possible public health impact</title>
<description>We do not think it is rational to base an assessment on childhood leukaemia
alone, when most of the hypothesised mechanisms and their supporting evidence
relates to biological systems involved in many diseases, rather than exclusively
to childhood leukaemia. The decreasing Degree of Certainty with greater numbers
of diseases is however reflected in the credibility factors. Therefore, while
there remains considerable uncertainty and imprecision in such assessments, it
seems sensible to give consideration to the above scenarios and multiple
outcomes, without adopting any one as definitive.</description>
<link>http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/henshaw/20060926_leukaemia_plus.asp</link>
<author>Denis Henshaw</author>
<subject>ELF Electromagnetic Fields</subject>
<pubDate>26/09/2006 11:33:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Clustering of Childhood Leukaemia and Childhood Cancer in Great Britain -
Response to the COMARE 11th Report</title>
<description>The statement in the Report that the non-random distributions of childhood
cancer could be due to various distributions of carcinogenic risk factors are
welcomed. However, the lack of specific mention of some of the factors widely
reported in the research literature as being linked to childhood leukaemia and
childhood cancer is disappointing. For example...</description>
<link>http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/henshaw/20060720_response.asp</link>
<author>Denis Henshaw</author>
<subject>Clustering of Childhood Leukaemia</subject>
<pubDate>20/07/2006 12:19:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Critique of the latest HPA-RPD report on melatonin and cancer</title>
<description>Some parts of the Report are satisfactory but the melatonin/cancer connection is not well illustrated considering the large amount of data available. As a result, the Report is rather un-authoritative when it discusses melatonin and cancer. There appears to be scientific misunderstanding and confusion in certain areas and lack of insightful comment. The widely differing concentrations of melatonin in blood, within cells and in certain organs is not discussed nor the reasons for its efficacy as an antioxidant and radical scavenger.</description>
<link>http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/columns/henshaw/20060302_critique.asp</link>
<author>Denis Henshaw</author>
<subject>Melatonin and Cancer</subject>
<pubDate>02/03/2006 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- </html> -->

