Denis Henshaw's Column
[Return to column index]
Adverse effects associated with exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields
- assembly of scientific evidence and discussion of possible public health impact
M. J. O'Carroll & D. L. Henshaw
This document is currently listed as being a work in progress
Summary
The following table gives the total impact, in thousands of pounds per year
per 1,000 exposed population, from EMF exposure for five 'what-if' scenarios, as
calculated in a moderate and transparent way in section 2.3. The impact of other
diseases is of the order of 100 times greater than that of childhood leukaemia
alone.
| CL Alone |
NIEHS 2 |
Calif 5 |
Calif 11 |
12 Diseases |
| 4 |
70 |
146 |
679 |
716 |
| 5 |
122 |
246 |
1899 |
2629 |
We do not think it is rational to base an assessment on childhood leukaemia
alone, when most of the hypothesised mechanisms and their supporting evidence
relates to biological systems involved in many diseases, rather than exclusively
to childhood leukaemia. The decreasing Degree of Certainty with greater numbers
of diseases is however reflected in the credibility factors. Therefore, while
there remains considerable uncertainty and imprecision in such assessments, it
seems sensible to give consideration to the above scenarios and multiple
outcomes, without adopting any one as definitive.
The next table shows the numbers of ELF-EMF epidemiological studies covered
in major reviews to 2002, as explained in section 2.2. This shows that, on the
basis of numbers of studies and their statistical strength, there is more and
stronger evidence for some other diseases than for childhood leukaemia.
| Studies |
Positives |
Significant Positives |
Significant Negatives |
| 19 |
16 |
3 |
0 |
| 43 |
32 |
11 |
0 |
| 150 |
110 |
36 |
1 |
Since 2002 there have been many new studies increasing knowledge of potential
mechanisms. Important earlier studies have been overlooked in the major reviews,
for example the results of Schuz et al. (2001) showing stronger associations of
childhood leukaemia with nocturnal exposure, with its implications for the
melatonin hypothesis.
In addition, we note two substantial areas of established and relevant
research which have also been largely overlooked: solar and geo-magnetic
activity (S-GMA), which includes ELF exposure, and bio-detection of magnetic
fields by migrating birds and other animals. Both give firm implications for
biological effects of very low fields. The first reinforces implications of ELF
EMFs for various diseases. The second reinforces implications for biological
mechanisms by which this may be possible.
Read the full document in 4 parts
[Download this summary as a pdf]
[Main Document - Volume 1]
[Main Document - Volume 2]
[Main Document - Volume 3]
|