print print

 Home
 My Account
   Log In
   Subscriber Info
 News / Mailing List  RSS XML Feed
 Columnists
   Alasdair Philips  RSS XML Feed
   Lloyd Morgan  RSS XML Feed
   Denis Henshaw  RSS XML Feed
 Science (General)
   Basic Guide to EMFs
   EMF Guidance Levels
   RF Unit Conversion
   List of Studies
   Bias and Confounding
   EMFs pre-2000
   FAQs
   Publications
   Links
 ELF ("Power" EMFs)
   Overview
   Powerlines
   Substations
   Electrical Wiring
   Appliances
 RF ("Microwave" EMFs)
   Overview
   Mobile Phones
   Cordless Phones
   Mobile Phone Masts
   WiFi
   Radio and TV
   TETRA
   Radar
   Microwave Ovens
 Health
   Childhood Leukaemia
   Brain Tumours
   Electromagnetic Sensitivity
   Microwave Sickness
   Other Health Effects
 Action
   Reduce Your Exposure
   - Mobile Phones
   - Phone Masts
   - Powerlines
   Screening Materials
   Online Store

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

- Liability Disclaimer -

Denis Henshaw's Column

[Return to column index]

Adverse effects associated with exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields - assembly of scientific evidence and discussion of possible public health impact

M. J. O'Carroll & D. L. Henshaw

This document is currently listed as being a work in progress

Summary

The following table gives the total impact, in thousands of pounds per year per 1,000 exposed population, from EMF exposure for five 'what-if' scenarios, as calculated in a moderate and transparent way in section 2.3. The impact of other diseases is of the order of 100 times greater than that of childhood leukaemia alone.

  CL Alone NIEHS 2 Calif 5 Calif 11 12 Diseases
With credibility factors 4 70 146 679 716
With definite causation 5 122 246 1899 2629

We do not think it is rational to base an assessment on childhood leukaemia alone, when most of the hypothesised mechanisms and their supporting evidence relates to biological systems involved in many diseases, rather than exclusively to childhood leukaemia. The decreasing Degree of Certainty with greater numbers of diseases is however reflected in the credibility factors. Therefore, while there remains considerable uncertainty and imprecision in such assessments, it seems sensible to give consideration to the above scenarios and multiple outcomes, without adopting any one as definitive.

The next table shows the numbers of ELF-EMF epidemiological studies covered in major reviews to 2002, as explained in section 2.2. This shows that, on the basis of numbers of studies and their statistical strength, there is more and stronger evidence for some other diseases than for childhood leukaemia.

Disease Studies Positives Significant Positives Significant Negatives
Childhood Leukaemia 19 16 3 0
Adult Leukaemia 43 32 11 0
9 Other Diseases 150 110 36 1

Since 2002 there have been many new studies increasing knowledge of potential mechanisms. Important earlier studies have been overlooked in the major reviews, for example the results of Schuz et al. (2001) showing stronger associations of childhood leukaemia with nocturnal exposure, with its implications for the melatonin hypothesis.

In addition, we note two substantial areas of established and relevant research which have also been largely overlooked: solar and geo-magnetic activity (S-GMA), which includes ELF exposure, and bio-detection of magnetic fields by migrating birds and other animals. Both give firm implications for biological effects of very low fields. The first reinforces implications of ELF EMFs for various diseases. The second reinforces implications for biological mechanisms by which this may be possible.

Read the full document in 4 parts

[Download this summary as a pdf]
[Main Document - Volume 1]
[Main Document - Volume 2]
[Main Document - Volume 3]