Mobile Phone Masts (Base Stations)
[Home Page]
[RF Overview]
[Mobile Phones]
[Cordless Phones]
[Phone Masts]
[WiFi]
[Radio and TV]
[TETRA]
[Radar]
[Microwave Ovens]
There are over 60 million phones in use in the UK. Phones are being used more
and more as the phone companies offer lots of free time deals. The existing
mobile phone masts cannot cope with the demand, so more are being erected all
over the country. Most network operators boast that they cover more than 99% of
the UK population, covering the country in a blanket of electrosmog.
People living near masts are experiencing increasing health problems,
especially sleep disruption, headaches, tiredness, behaviour changes in
children, epilepsy, nosebleeds, skin complaints (See published research on
humans - non-cancer, below).
The government received 22.6 billion pounds from selling the 3rd generation
licences in 2000, and mobile phone related revenue now exceeds 20 billion pounds
per year.
It is also important to remember that by the end of 2007 all Operators were
required to install, maintain and provide 3G service where at least 80% of the
population live, under the terms of their licenses granted to them by Central
Government in 2000. All Operators managed this except O2 who hope to be the end
of the summer 2008 (they were up to about 75% at the end of 2007).
We have now written a unit conversion
document (with integrated calculator) and an updated international maximum exposure guidance levels document. There is also an
excellent memorandum
written by Alan Meyer (for Mast Action UK) regarding "Local Government
Responsibilities" towards exposure to masts.
Many people do not know how many masts there are near them. There is a
government website which has a reasonably accurate map of the masts currently
integrated into the national network. Details are only put up when the mast is
up and running. OFCOM, which maintains the site, depends on the phone operators
to give them accurate information about the base station. They update the
site every 3 months (or so). We
have found some inaccuracies with respect to the existence, siting and
information included on the database - and we have not looked at many places. Do
not accept the information as definitive or accurate. The powers are given in
dBW - you may need to read our Mobile Phones and Masts book to understand what these units mean in practice.
There is a dispute between the UK Information Commissioner, Ofcom and T-Mobile
about whether the full Sitefinder database should be downloadable. Ofcom went to
the High Court to stop the British public getting access to a list of every
mobile phone mast in the UK. The Regulator is appealing the Information
Commissioner's decision that the public has the right to know where all
cellphone masts are located.
In September 2007, an Information Tribunal upheld a Freedom of Information
request ruled that the public should have access to a full list of every base
station in the UK. Though Ofcom argued that this is an unreasonable intrusion
into the privacy of the network operators, it was told the information must be
made available, in addition to allowing people to search small areas as they can
now. The information behind Sitefinder is supplied voluntarily, but reluctantly,
by the network operators.
T-Mobile hasn't provided any cell information since August 2005, and
generally joins Ofcom in court as a representative of the rest of the mobile
industry. In the meantime, Ofcom has been holding discussions with operators,
which have now resulted in a resumption of voluntary provision of this data. 3,
O2, Orange, Vodafone, Airwave and Network Rail all supply data to Ofcom at
approximately three month intervals (T-Mobile has refused to do so since 2005).
Ofcom will also appeal the decision of the Information Tribunal, and a further
hearing in the High Court is anticipated.
Many masts have more than one operator; the antennas have different degrees
of uptilt or downtilt; the geography of the area is different; the distance the
antennas need to cover is different. Microwaves are reflected off surfaces
(especially metal ones) as well as absorbed. The amount of microwaves in an area
will depend on things like metal roofs, lamp posts and other structures,
building materials and structural additions, cars and lorries, etc. The only way
to know for certain how a particular place, such as a house, flat, school or
workplace, is affected by environmental microwave radiation is to measure the
exposure.
If you live near a phone mast and are concerned about risks to your health,
please read our section on reducing your
exposure.
Planning Laws
Equipment on masts over 15 metres high, and other limited, special
circumstances, need full planning permission. Small additional changes do not
need permission. Several companies can share a mast or site. Lower height
antennas do not need full planning permission.
When an application for a new mast is made, people have only 56 days to
respond. This time limit is very strict and many applications have gone through
because the time has expired. It is important to find out as much as you can,
as quickly as possible, if you wish to lodge an objection. See our book "Mobile Phones and
Masts, the Health Risks".
Published research into mobile phone base station health effects
The following are links into recent research finding strong evidence that
phone mast emissions may well be having detrimental effects on the exposed
population:
Research involving humans - cancer
1. P
Wolf R, Wolf D, (April 2004) Increased incidence of cancer near a cell-phone transmitter station, International Journal of Cancer Prevention, 1(2) April 2004 [ View Comments
and Links]
2. P
Eger H et al, (November 2004) The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer, Umwelt Medizin Gesellschaft 17,4 2004 [ View Comments
and Links]
Research involving humans - non-cancer
3. P
Abdel-Rassoul G et al, (March 2007) Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations, Neurotoxicology. 2007 Mar;28(2):434-40 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
6. P
Bortkiewicz A et al, (2004) Subjective symptoms reported by people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base stations: review, Med Pr. 2004;55(4):345-51 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
7. P
Nikolova T et al, (October 2005) Electromagnetic fields affect transcript levels of apoptosis-related genes in embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells, FASEB J. 2005 Oct;19(12):1686-8 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
8. P
Santini R et al, (September 2003) Symptoms experienced by people in vicinity of base stations: II/ Incidences of age, duration of exposure, location of subjects in relation to the antennas and other electromagnetic factors, Pathol Biol (Paris). 2003 Sep;51(7):412-5 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
9. P
Navarro EA et al, (December 2003) The Microwave Syndrome: A Preliminary Study in Spain, Electromagn Biol Med 22(2-3): 161-169 [ View Comments
and Links]
10. P
Santini R et al, (July 2002) Investigation on the health of people living near mobile telephone relay stations: I/Incidence according to distance and sex, Pathol Biol (Paris) 2002 Jul;50(6):369-73 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
REFLEX Report - Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards
From Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro
Methods. A project funded by the European Union under the programme "Quality
of Life and Management of Living Resources"
- Ross Adey's foreword on this site
- Download the whole
291 page scientific report (10.8MB)*
* Please be aware that this is a large file and may take some time to
download
Research involving animals
11. P
Everaert J, Bauwens D, (2007) A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus), Electromagn Biol Med. 2007;26(1):63-72 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
12. P
Balmori A, (October 2005) Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields from Phone Masts on a Population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia), Electromagn Biol Med 24: 109-119, 2005 [ View Comments
and Links]
Other Articles
- New problems with cellphone
radiation, Andrew Michrowski (November 2005)
-
German Doctors unite on RF health effects from masts (Bamberg, July 2005)
- Article on TETRA in October 2004 issue of
the Ecologist (September 2004)
-
The inadequacy of ICNIRP guidelines covering human exposure to mobile phone base
stations (December 2003)
- How Exposure to
GSM & TETRA Base-station radiation can Adversely Affect Humans (May 2003)
-
Freiburger Appeal, signed by a number of established medical physicians
(December 2002)
Our columnist, Lloyd
Morgan, has produced the following three articles. The first link is
intended for reporters, editors and EMF health activists, with the intention of
educating readers how to intelligently interpret EMF Science papers and provide
a precautionary approach to the situation that would not result in needing to
lose cellphones. It discusses all the peer-reviewed science studies through
Nov. 2004, on the risk of brain tumors of various types from cellphone use. The
second link is a report given to an organization of American doctors. It
discusses the previously published risk of leukemia and brain tumor from power
frequency EMFs and reports on findings how transients from power frequency EMFs
are linked to increases in blood glucose and asthma in school children. The
third article is a good overview of the health implications of EMFs in an FAQ
format, including references:
- Cellphones and Human Health (Lloyd Morgan, April 2005)
- High Frequency Transients on Electrical Wiring - A Missing Link to Increasing Diabetes and Asthma? (Lloyd Morgan)
- What's the Buzz on Electricity? (Lloyd Morgan, May 2005)
|