[Skip to content]
 Home
 News Index
 Our researched articles
 Science (General)
   List of studies
   Basic guide to EMFs
   EMF guidance levels
   RF unit conversion
   FAQs
   Other resources
 ELF ("Power" EMFs)
   Overview
   Powerlines
   Substations
   Electrical wiring
   Electrical appliances
 RF ("Microwave" EMFs)
   Overview
   WiFi
   Mobile phones
   Cordless phones
   Mobile phone masts
   Other resources
 Health
   Childhood leukaemia
   Brain tumours
   Electromagnetic sensitivity
   Other health effects
 Action
   Reduce your exposure
   - Mobile phones
   - Phone masts
   - Powerlines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

- Liability disclaimer -
- Privacy policy -
- Cookies policy -
© Copyright Powerwatch 2024

Powerwatch Forums - View Thread - Tetra masts and mind control

[Back to Forums Main Index]
[Back to Powerwatch Open Forum Index]

Tetra masts and mind control

Post Time: 17/12/2007 23:44:26
DMaclean
Total Forum Posts: 8
On reading a report written by Barrie Trower for the UK Police Federation, I was wondering whether it is possible that Tetra technology could be used as a form of mind control, as there are apparently plans for thousands more Tetra masts to be located throughout the country. The frequency of 17.6Hz makes this seem quite plausible. What is your opinion on this?
Post Time: 23/12/2007 12:50:58
alasdairP
Total Forum Posts: 173
I originally wondered about this. The handsets pulse strongly at that frequency, but the masts only VERY weakly at 17.6 and 70.4 Hz. The new TETRA2 software has now eliminated the 17.6 and 70.4 Hz interframe gaps and most TETRA masts now do not have any ELF pulsing. They do produce a lot of audio-band EMR in the range 2 to 18 kHz and which can be heard on a simple AM demodulator as a loud sounding hiss.

I believe the roll-out of TETRA was not connected with the 17.6 Hz and mind control issues, but actually because Motorola owned the encryption rights and, as they are an American corporation, all systems sold had to have their keys given to the US NSA who can then monitor the security services in any country using TETRA. That was why Britain was seen as a key flagship demonstration country to help sell the TETRA system around the world.

The better and non-ELF pulsing TETRAPOL system was owned by the French and they were just about the last "friendly" country that the USA and Britain wanted to have the decryption rights. That was why the UK tendering process for the new secure communications system was biased and was eventually judged illegal by the European Court - though I don't think any action was taken against the UK over this illegal process.

Alasdair