30/06/2002 - Various Old Power Frequency News
Don Maisch and colleagues have just had a paper published called "Changes in
Health Status in a Group of CFS and CF patients Following Removal of Excessive
50 Hz Magnetic Field Exposure" in the Journal of the Australasian College of
Nutritional & Environmental Medicine (JACNEM, Vol.21 No.1, April 2002). They
are also producing a poster on "Reducing the Level of 50 Hz Magnetic Fields
Lessens Symptoms of Chronic Fatigue and Improves Sleep" at the 2nd International
Workshop On Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields 7-11 October 2002,
Rhodes, Greece.
Levels of occupational exposure to high magnetic fields have again been shown
to increase the risk of developing aggressive types of brain tumours. Dr Paul
Villeneuve, of Ottawa University adds his finding to that of Feychting and the
combined analysis of various studies by Kheifets. Villeneuve says in the
International Journal of Epidemiology 31, pp. 210-217 (reported in Microwave
News, that his new study results are "consistent with the hypothesis that
magnetic fields act at the promotional stage" of brain cancer.
The late Martin Gardner who battled for the recognition that there was a link
between paternal radiation of Sellafield employees and the incidence of
leukaemia among their children, has now been vindicated. After the nuclear
industry were vehemently denying and putting interesting 'slants' on research
into Sellafield cancer risks, a new study by Heather Dickson and Louise Parker
from the University of Newcastle, supported by the nuclear industry, appear to
back claims he made about such a link 12 years ago. The children of men exposed
to radiation at the Sellafield nuclear plant in Cumbria have twice the normal
risk of leukaemia and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The incidence was 15 times as
great in Seascale, a small village next to the power plant, New Scientist
magazine said. Crucially, the risk to children rose in line with the radiation
dose received by their fathers.
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is relaxing its
conflict-of-interest rules for authors of its most comprehensive articles
because it cannot find qualified experts with no financial ties to drug
companies. Medical journal editors estimate that 95 percent of academic
researchers looking at which drugs and treatments work and are safe have
financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies. In 2000, after a series
of articles in the Los Angeles Times, the journal was forced to acknowledge it
had violated its own conflict-of-interest policy 19 times over the previous
three years when choosing doctors to review new drug treatments. Only last week,
the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published studies
criticizing itself and its rival publications--as well as the media--for
presenting some material to the public that isn't true or is stained by
conflicts of interest. "I'm dismayed," said Harvard's Dr. Arnold Relman,
who edited the publication from 1977 to 1991. "I think it's a sad commentary
on the state of academic medicine that you can't find top-flight experts who
aren't connected to industry". The policy change does not affect original
studies in the publication--3,500 to 3,800 are submitted each year, of which
only 5 to 7 percent are selected. Those will still contain disclosures of who
sponsored the research being presented and any financial stakes the authors
might have. From now on, the journal will forbid only a "significant" financial
stake, as defined by the National Institutes of Health and the Association of
American Medical Colleges: Payments of up to $10,000 a year are not considered
significant. It reminds us somewhat of research into the potential health
hazards of electromagnetic radiation, mobile phones, masts and powerlines!
Allan and Beverly Hoffman own a farm in New London, Wisconsin. In the
mid-1980s, the Hoffmans' cows started producing less milk, behaving oddly and
not consuming as much feed and water as previously After investigation, they
believed the changes observed in the dairy herd were a result of stray voltage
from power lines. Stray voltage is electricity that leaks from a utility's
electrical distribution system or farm wiring and may decrease milk production
or cause animal health problems. The 4th District Court of Appeals upheld a
jury's May 2000 verdict, awarding a $1.2 million judgment, in favour of the
Hoffmans, who claimed the utility was negligent in permitting an underground
utility system to serve their farm. The utility argued that it had relied on the
state Public Service Commission findings that its manner of distributing
electricity could only harm livestock if it passes through the animal. The state
Supreme Court have agreed to hear an appeal from Wisconsin Electric Power Co.,
recently renamed We Energies. Attorney Scott Lawrence said that if the court
finds in the Hoffmans' favour, utilities will be compelled to fix stray voltage
problems, regardless of what levels the Public Service Commission says are
harmful.
Toxic Chemicals Contribute To Increased Childhood Illness
The reported incidence of cancer and other diseases among America's children
is rising. Too little is known about possible relationships between childhood
disease and an environmental "soup" of thousands of mostly untested industrial
chemicals that didn't even exist a half-century ago, they said. Virtually all of
the 85,000 chemicals registered with the Environmental Protection Agency for
commercial use in America did not exist before the 1960s and less than half have
been properly tested for their effects on human beings, and certainly
combinations of exposures have not been investigated. But cancer remains the
largest cause of disease death among children. There has been a 25 percent rise
in the incidence of childhood leukaemia since the 1960s and a 21 percent
increase in brain cancer. In view of the concentration of chemicals deposited
around powerlines and other sources of electric fields, and recent research
showing that mobile phone exposure reduces the protective barrier that prevents
toxic chemicals from reaching the brain; chemical and electromagnetic pollution
are putting the lives of our children at risk.
|