Home
 My Account
   Log In
   Register
   Article Library
 Latest News
   News Index RSS XML Feed
   Mailing List
 Columnists
   Alasdair Philips RSS XML Feed
   Graham Lamburn RSS XML Feed
   Cancer Watch
   Lloyd Morgan RSS XML Feed
   Denis Henshaw RSS XML Feed
 Science (General)
   Basic Guide to EMFs
   EMF Guidance Levels
   RF Unit Conversion
   List of Studies
   Bias and Confounding
   EMFs pre-2000
   FAQs
   Publications
   Links
 ELF ("Power" EMFs)
   Overview
   SAGE
   Powerlines
   Substations
   Electrical Wiring
   Appliances
 RF ("Microwave" EMFs)
   Overview
   Mobile Phones
   Cordless Phones
   Mobile Phone Masts
   WiFi
   Radio and TV
   TETRA
   Radar
   Microwave Ovens
 Health
   Childhood Leukaemia
   Brain Tumours
   Electromagnetic Sensitivity
   Microwave Sickness
   Other Health Effects
 Action
   Reduce Your Exposure
   - Mobile Phones
   - Phone Masts
   - Powerlines
   Screening Materials
   Online Store

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

- Liability Disclaimer -
- Privacy Policy -
© Copyright Powerwatch 2012

03/12/2004 - Government Guidelines may be 500 times too dangerous


Mailing List

Enter your email below to sign up to the Powerwatch news mailing list


[Add / Remove email address]

Applying WHO air quality precaution would set EMF guidance to 0.2 microtesla

This downloadable summary sheet, entitled "comparison of the precautionary approach to exposure to Air Pollution and to Power Frequency Magnetic Fields", produced by Professor Denis Henshaw for the UK SAGE group workshop on 23 November 2004, compares and contrasts the differing approaches to precaution from exposure to air pollution and to power frequency magnetic fields. It takes its material principally from the PowerPoint presentation of Professor Michael Kundi at the CHILDREN with LEUKAEMIA Scientific Conference in September 2004. See website (His presentation can be downloaded the following page: "Programme" >> "Day 5" >> "Programme").

  • There is evidence of an increased leukaemia risk in children
  • There is some support from long-term animal studies
  • There is some support from in vitro studies and a plausible and testable mechanistic hypothesis
  • A precautionary procedure as applied for air pollutants would result in a recommended exposure standard of 0.2 µT (2 mG), not 100 µT as currently recommended by ICNIRP and the UK NRPB

Download the summary sheet from here:

Word Version, 37.5kb - Word (37.5k)
PDF Version, 42.3kb - PDF (42.3k)