[Skip to content]
 Home
 News Index RSS XML Feed
 Our researched articles
 Science (General)
   List of studies
   Basic guide to EMFs
   EMF guidance levels
   RF unit conversion
   FAQs
   Other resources
 ELF ("Power" EMFs)
   Overview
   Powerlines
   Substations
   Electrical wiring
   Electrical appliances
 RF ("Microwave" EMFs)
   Overview
   WiFi
   Mobile phones
   Cordless phones
   Mobile phone masts
   Other resources
 Health
   Childhood leukaemia
   Brain tumours
   Electromagnetic sensitivity
   Other health effects
 Action
   Reduce your exposure
   - Mobile phones
   - Phone masts
   - Powerlines
   EMFields store

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

- Liability disclaimer -
- Privacy policy -
- Cookies policy -
© Copyright Powerwatch 2017

» Printer friendly version

20/07/2006 - COMARE report refuses to acknowledge power lines as a cancer cause

The 11th COMARE report has just come out highlighting the finding that there is now very good evidence that cancer isn't evenly distributed throughout the UK population, but exhibits distinct signs of clustering. There have been numerous speculations about the possible causes of clustering, of which the only two causes named in the press releases of both COMARE and the HPA are infection and proximity to nuclear power stations, of which the latter is explained to have been shown to have no cancer rate increase.

There is very little actual evidence of the association with infections - it is just a theory that fits quite well, but though people have looked, they have so far not found convincing scientific evidence that it actually happens, similarly with what they found to proximity to nuclear power stations. However, there is clear epidemiological evidence that Petrochemicals (e.g. George Knox - see petrochemical references below) and Powerlines (Draper, etc - see powerline references below) are firmly associated with increased incidence in child leukaemia and some other cancers. These are not even mentioned in the COMARE or HPA Press Releases, which considering the title is highly disappointing.

Petrochemical references

Knox, E G (2005) "Childhood cancers and atmospheric carcinogens", J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59:101-105
doi:10.1136/jech.2004.021675 [View on PubMed]

Knox, E G (2006) "Roads, railways and childhood cancers", J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60:136-141
doi:10.1136/jech.2005.042036 [View on PubMed]

Knox, E G (2005) "Oil combustion and childhood cancers", J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59:755-760
doi:10.1136/jech.2004.031674 [View on PubMed]

Powerline references

Draper, G et al (2005) "Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study", BMJ 2005;330:1290
doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1290 [View on PubMed] [View on the BMJ website]

Kabuto, M et al (2006) "Childhood leukemia and magnetic fields in Japan: a case-control study of childhood leukemia and residential power-frequency magnetic fields in Japan.", Int J Cancer. 2006 Aug 1;119(3):643-50
doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1290 [View on PubMed]