12/11/2008 - Living close to a powerline can double your chance of dying from Alzheimer's Disease
A large new study
from Switzerland[Huss 2008] shows a
significant dose-related increase in deaths from Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in
people who have lived for a number of years within 50 metres of high-voltage
overhead powerlines. The results of this new study considerably raises the
stakes in the EMF-health debate by showing up a serious and wide-spread public
ill health problem as being closely associated with power-frequency magnetic
field exposure. The cost of dementia to the UK economy is estimated to be over
£17 billion (GBP) per year.
Researchers at Bern University's Institute of Social and Preventative
Medicine in Switzerland have found that people who have lived for least 5 years
within 50 metres had an adjusted hazard ratio for dying of AD of 1.51,
increasing to 1.78 after 10 years and to 2.0 (CI 1.21-3.33) after living there
for at least 15 years. The pattern was similar for senile dementia.
The relation between where people live in relation to power lines and
mortality from neurodegenerative conditions was analyzed within the data for 4.7
million people in the Swiss National (mortality and census) Cohort, covering the
period 2000-2005. If anything this will have underestimated the risk as AD is
often not entered as the prime or even underlying cause of death - so the actual
incidence of the disease will almost certainly be higher.
Team member Professor Matthias Egger also warned that sleeping in
power-frequency magnetic fields from any source probably presents a dementia
risk. He said: "Anything that is plugged in and that is on all the time and
that is near to your body is a source of EMF".
Magnetic fields from underground electricity cables, especially those that
run under the pavements and supply our houses are another most significant
source of higher-than-normal magnetic fields in homes, often up to several
microtesla. This was highlighted in a report by the NRPB a few years ago [Maslanyj
2005]. Powerwatch has found it to be a common problem, especially in
older areas of UK cities. The Department of Health SAGE Process will be investigating this matter during
2009 and hopefully reporting in early 2010.
Previous Research
The findings of this new Swiss study are consistent with the combined
analyses of risk of Alzheimer's with occupational exposure to power-frequency
magnetic fields by Ana Garcia[Garcia 2008],
published earlier in 2008. Her study combined the results of 14 occupational
studies (from 1995 to 2004) of EMF exposure and the later development of
Alzheimer's disease. This resulted in an overall increased odds (risk) ratio of
2.03 (95% CI 1.38–3.00) from the case-control studies and 1.62 (CI 1.16–2.27)
rising to 2.05 (95% CI 1.51–2.80) for men. They estimated that the effect
occurred when the average magnetic field was over about 0.5 microtesla.
Interestingly, this would agree well with the 50 metres distance from the
powerlines in the new Swiss study.
The evidence for risk of Alzheimer's is now quantitatively comparable with
that for childhood leukaemia, which is recognised as an IARC class 2B
carcinogen.
For further detailed background information we suggest that you download and
read Section 12 of the BioInitiative
Report.
Alzheimer's Disease
The Alzheimer's
Research Trust and Alzheimer's Society report that there are 700,000 people living with
dementia in the UK today, a number forecast to double within a generation. 25
million people, or 42% of the UK population, are affected by dementia through
knowing a close friend or family member with the condition. 1 in 3 over 65s will
die with some form of dementia. Each year 39,400 more people are diagnosed with
Alzheimer's Disease in England and Wales. That equates to one new case every 14
minutes.
In the UK, about 200,000 people live within 50 metres of a high-voltage
overhead powerline[SAGE interim assessment]. If
"normally", 1 in 3 will develop AD before they die (see last paragraph) and
exposure to the power-frequency magnetic fields doubles this, then that would be
another 66,000 cases just due to living near to overhead powerlines. Extra cases
will be due to underground net-current problems and fields from transformers and
other high magnetic field sources within our homes.
Possible mechanisms
Several mechanisms have been proposed and studied in order to explain
potential ELF-EMF actions on biological systems. Zecca expressed his concerns in
1998[Zecca 1998] that "Should future
epidemiological studies confirm an increased risk for neurological disorders,
particularly for Alzheimer's disease, in chronic EMF exposed individuals, a
study like the present one should be extended to rats exposed for the whole life
span and to primates with a variety of exposure protocols". Habash, et al,
wrote a useful over-view[Habash 2003] as did the
World Health Organisation in their Environmental Health Criteria EHC-238. One likely contender is the
'melatonin hypothesis', involving melatonin and biosynthetic enzymes in the
pineal gland[Reiter 2001, Henshaw
2005]. Others are oxidative stress or cellular Ca2+ efflux in immune
system cells and neurons. Melatonin is a strong protector against oxidative
stress. Other possibilities include apoptosis and necrosis in brain cells,
effects on biomagnetic particles reported in the human brain or even
differential levels of electrosensitivity among the general population.
Whatever the mechanism (or, more probably mixture of mechanisms), we now have
a large general public epidemiological analysis whose results closely match
those from 14 occupational studies that show a statistical doubling of
Alzheimer's Disease associated with power-frequency magnetic fields above about
0.5 microtesla. This should be more that enough to trigger a more precautionary
approach to EMF exposure that will better protect the public from harm.
Currently the ICNIRP and UK public maximum exposure guidance levels are set
200-fold higher at 100 microtesla. Occupational levels are set even higher and
this must be of concern to exposed occupations (such as railway
workers), especially as the HPA has recently being saying that the
occupational maximum guidance levels could probably be relaxed (i.e. made even higher, maybe up to 1800 microtesla).
Conclusions
If average background power-frequency magnetic fields above 0.5 microtesla do
double the incidence of Alzheimer's Disease, then this represents a far more
serious overall public health problem than the association with childhood
leukaemia, serious though that is for the individuals involved. It would
completely change the cost-benefit calculations that SAGE has been making and
would almost certainly greatly strengthen their advice to Government set out
in the first SAGE Report that was published last year (2007). The Goverment has
not yet responded to the first SAGE Report, but has promised to do so by the
end of 2008. There is a linked blog
entry making some further comments.
References
1. P
Huss A et al, (November 2008) Residence Near Power Lines and Mortality From Neurodegenerative Diseases: Longitudinal Study of the Swiss Population, Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Nov 5. [Epub ahead of print]Click here to read [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
2. -
Maslanyj MP et al, (August 2005) Investigation and Identification of Sources of Residential Magnetic Field Exposures in the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study (UKCCS), HPA-RPD-005 - ISBN 0 85951 564 8 [ View Comments
and Links]
3. P
Garcia AM et al, (April 2008) Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis, Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 2 [Epub ahead of print] [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
4. P
UK DH, (April 2007) Supporting papers to the SAGE first interim assessment, From SAGE supporting document S15, pp.60-66 [ View Comments
and Links]
5. P
Zecca L et al, (1998) Biological effects of prolonged exposure to ELF electromagnetic fields in rats: III. 50 Hz electromagnetic fields, Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):57-66 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
6. -
Habash RW et al, (2003) Health risks of electromagnetic fields. Part I: Evaluation and assessment of electric and magnetic fields, Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;31(3):141-95 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
7. P
Reiter RJ et al, (June 2001) Free radical-mediated molecular damage. Mechanisms for the protective actions of melatonin in the central nervous system, Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;939:200-15 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
8. P
Henshaw DL, Reiter RJ, (2005) Do magnetic fields cause increased risk of childhood leukemia via melatonin disruption?, Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S86-97 [ View Comments
and Links] [ View
on Pubmed]
|