[Skip to content]
 News Index
 Our researched articles
 Science (General)
   List of studies
   Basic guide to EMFs
   EMF guidance levels
   RF unit conversion
   Other resources
 ELF ("Power" EMFs)
   Electrical wiring
   Electrical appliances
 RF ("Microwave" EMFs)
   Mobile phones
   Cordless phones
   Mobile phone masts
   Other resources
   Childhood leukaemia
   Brain tumours
   Electromagnetic sensitivity
   Other health effects
   Reduce your exposure
   - Mobile phones
   - Phone masts
   - Powerlines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

- Liability disclaimer -
- Privacy policy -
- Cookies policy -
© Copyright Powerwatch 2024

15/11/2006 - 80% of the published studies on phone masts show health effects

Jean-Luc Guilmot, a Belgian bio-engineer, has made public a .pdf slide from a presentation he made in Louvain-la-Neuve University during a conference on health concerns regarding mobile phone masts. In the slide he summarises the results of the effects found on all published epidemiological research papers on PubMed and WHO that look into phone masts. Despite the small number of returned papers, the results are staggering, with 8 out of the 10 papers showing a statistically significant health effect from mobile phone mast exposure.

Jean-Luc accompanies the slide with the following text:

"If you look at epidemiological studies on mobile phone base stations available on either on WHO EMF database or on PUBMED, there are only 10 published peer-reviewed studies: 8 of them show positive results (= health nuisances) and 2 show negative results.

Message for the Industry and Public Health Authorities: WHO Fact Sheet N° 304 contradicts WHO's own database. Norms are concepts. Epidemiological studies which have been peer-reviewed are based on real life. Where are the peer-reviewed studies that show phone masts are NOT a health concern?"


[View related slide as a .pdf (104 KB)]

Also in the news

Secret Ties to Industry and Conflicting Interests in Cancer Research

Lennart Hardell has produced a new paper, published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine, showing a shocking number of publicised accounts of research where conflicts of interest between science and industry are only too apparent.

Citing cases involving Philip Morris, Exponent Inc, Monsanto and Motorola, Hardell gives an excellent argument for need of increased transparency and regulations to ensure that epidemiological research is kept as impartial as possible from vested corporate and industrial interests.

[View full abstract on Pubmed]

This page has links to content that requires a .pdf reader such as Download Adobe Reader Adobe Acrobat Reader